PROVISION
about the reviewing of scientific articles in „Moldavian Journal of International Law and International Relations”
-
Scientific articles undergo a four-level review process in the journal:
1. Review by the main editor (double-blind).
2. Open peer review (author and reviewer know each other).
3. Single-blind review.
4. Double-blind review (both parties are unaware of each other's identity).
-
Each scientific article must have reviews from different levels, including open and closed reviews.
-
All submitted articles undergo mandatory double-blind external review by experts chosen by the editorial board.
-
The editorial board evaluates reviews for the relevance of the author's scientific problem, theoretical or applied significance, and adherence to scientific concepts.
-
Final decisions on publication or rejection are made based on the reviews. Authors receive feedback on the decision.
-
The editorial board may send articles for additional external anonymous review.
-
Positive reviews do not guarantee publication; the editorial board makes the final decision.
-
In case of substantial criticisms and an overall positive recommendation, the material may be considered for publication as part of a scientific discussion.
-
Original reviews are kept in the editorial office of the journal.