PROVISION
about the reviewing of scientific articles in „Moldavian Journal of International Law and International Relations”
- Scientific articles undergo a four-level review process in the journal: 1. Review by the main editor (double-blind). 2. Open peer review (author and reviewer know each other). 3. Single-blind review. 4. Double-blind review (both parties are unaware of each other's identity).
- Each scientific article must have reviews from different levels, including open and closed reviews.
- All submitted articles undergo mandatory double-blind external review by experts chosen by the editorial board.
- The editorial board evaluates reviews for the relevance of the author's scientific problem, theoretical or applied significance, and adherence to scientific concepts.
- Final decisions on publication or rejection are made based on the reviews. Authors receive feedback on the decision.
- The editorial board may send articles for additional external anonymous review.
- Positive reviews do not guarantee publication; the editorial board makes the final decision.
- In case of substantial criticisms and an overall positive recommendation, the material may be considered for publication as part of a scientific discussion.
- Original reviews are kept in the editorial office of the journal.